← All comparisons

Streamlingo vs Voco

Streamlingo vs Voco

Streamlingo assumes headphones and AI voice. Voco assumes reading on a phone. Different bets on how people follow along.

Prices and features verified 2026-07-26 source

Streamlingo and Voco make different bets about how people actually follow a translated sermon. Streamlingo leads with AI voice — guests scan a QR code and listen through their own headphones. Voco leads with text on screen, with the phone's text-to-speech available on top. Neither is universally right; it depends on your congregation. Streamlingo's current public page advertises a one-time 2-hour no-card trial and says its annually billed Small plan averages about €10 per hour, while live tier totals load dynamically. Voco is a flat £6/week with no cap. Check the live checkout before deciding.

Vendor-published facts and sources

  • pricing: Current public page describes the annually billed Small plan as averaging €10 per hour; live tier totals are loaded dynamically Source
  • trial: One-time free trial with 2 hours of AI translation and no credit card Source
  • languages: 80+ output languages and more than 150 supported languages Source
  • audio: AI voice and text output; guests scan a QR code and can listen with their own headphones Source

Last reviewed 2026-07-26. Vendor facts can change; “not published” never means “not available.”

At a glance

FeatureVocoStreamlingo
Starting price
£6/week or £24/month
~Live total shown dynamically; Small averages about €10/hour annually
Free trial
7 days, no card
One-time 2 hours, no card
Usage metering
No time limit on any plan
~Included allowance plus usage charges when a service runs long
Primary delivery
Text on screen, phone TTS available
AI voice through the listener's headphones
Headphones needed
No — reading works without
~Recommended for audio listening
Languages
200+
80+
No attendee app
Yes — QR code, any browser
Yes — QR code
Deaf and hard-of-hearing use
Text-first, works without audio
~Audio-led
Scripture detection
Detects references and inserts the published translation
Not described
Biblical glossary control
Yes — glossary and word boost
Not described
OBS / ProPresenter
Native on Church plan (£12/week)
Not described
Transcript export
Bilingual transcript export
Not described

Where Voco wins

Nobody has to bring headphones

Streamlingo's model assumes the listener has headphones with them. In practice a meaningful share of visitors do not, and asking someone to sit through a sermon holding a phone to their ear is not realistic. Voco's text-first approach works with nothing but the phone already in their pocket, silently, without disturbing the person next to them.

The same feature serves deaf and hard-of-hearing attendees

Because Voco is text-first, the same live output that serves a Spanish speaker also serves a deaf or hard-of-hearing member reading in English. An audio-led product cannot do that. For most churches this doubles the return on the same subscription, and it is why Voco publishes dedicated guidance for deaf and hard-of-hearing use.

No live-time meter

Streamlingo describes included AI-translation and listening allowances, followed by fair usage charges if a service runs long. Voco is £6/week for Starter and £12/week for Church with no live-time cap, so the cost does not climb as usage does. Compare on your real monthly hours rather than a headline rate.

Projection, transcripts and scripture handling

Voco's Church plan includes OBS and ProPresenter output for on-screen captions, plus bilingual transcript export afterwards, and detects spoken scripture references to insert the officially published translation. Streamlingo does not describe these.

Where Streamlingo wins

An honest comparison means showing both sides.

AI voice as the main event

Streamlingo is built around spoken output — guests listen rather than read. For congregations where people speak a language more comfortably than they read it, which is common with several diaspora languages and with older attendees, listening is the better experience. Voco's phone text-to-speech is a secondary route rather than the design centre.

A two-hour trial

Streamlingo's one-time two-hour trial is long enough to rehearse and run a normal service, with no card required. Voco's trial lasts seven days rather than using an hour allowance. Both provide a practical test; Streamlingo gives the clearer amount of live audio.

A public hourly benchmark

Streamlingo says its annually billed Small plan averages about €10 per hour. The live plan totals are loaded dynamically, but publishing an hourly benchmark still helps a church estimate the cost of audio-first translation against its real service schedule.

Pricing comparison

Streamlingo's current public church page advertises a one-time two-hour trial with no card and says the annually billed Small plan averages about €10 per hour. Exact live tier totals are loaded dynamically, and the page describes fair usage charges after included allowances. Voco is £6/week for Starter and £12/week for Church, with no usage cap on either. The more important comparison is delivery: Streamlingo is audio-first and assumes headphones; Voco is text-first and assumes reading. Figures checked against Streamlingo's public church page on 26 July 2026; confirm the checkout total for your country.

Frequently asked questions

Do attendees need headphones with Streamlingo?

Streamlingo is built around AI voice output, so listeners are expected to use their own headphones. Voco is text-first, so attendees read on their phone with nothing else required — though Voco can also read aloud using the phone's built-in text-to-speech if someone prefers to listen.

Which is better for a congregation that prefers listening?

Streamlingo, honestly. It is designed around spoken output. Voco's audio comes from the listener's phone text-to-speech, which is convenient and needs no install but is not as natural as generated speech. If most of your language group would rather listen than read, that should drive the decision.

Can Voco serve deaf and hard-of-hearing attendees too?

Yes, and this is a real advantage of a text-first design. The same live translated text that serves a Spanish speaker also serves a deaf or hard-of-hearing member reading in English, from the same subscription. An audio-led tool cannot do that.

Is Streamlingo's free trial useful?

Yes. Its current public page advertises a one-time two-hour AI-translation trial with no card, enough for a rehearsal and a normal service. Voco instead offers seven days with no card, so compare the same service audio in both.

Related comparisons

Try it yourself

Free for 7 days — no credit card

Guided setup helps you rehearse before Sunday. Cancel any time.

Start free trial